New website address
Hello all.
My blog has migrated to a new address which is more image friendly.
You will find it at:
http://marclowe1963.spaces.live.com
Hello all.
My blog has migrated to a new address which is more image friendly.
You will find it at:
http://marclowe1963.spaces.live.com
But most of all, it was the airlines reputation as the safest carrier in the WORLD, that made us proud. For a nation who new that our country of only 20 million people would never have the economic, political or military bulk to play anything other than supporting roles, being the best to so many travellers throughout the world was a source of national pride.
During WW2, American fighter and bomber squadrons based in the Pacific would routinely send engine parts; magnetos, carburettors etc back to Qantas in
But over recent years there has been an increasingly steady drip of 'minor mishaps'. Not just the recent 747's oxygen canisters blowing holes in the wing root last month, but others such as the jumbo overshooting the runway in
Management downplays it and calls them ‘mishaps’, ‘technical malfunctions’ or other euphemisms to try to convince us that somehow this stuff ‘doesn’t really count’ in safety or accident statistics. But to those who’ve known the airline for a long time one thing is sure – this stuff never happened before.
http://www.huliq.com/65139/new-qantas-accident-now-door-open-midair
Qantas is becoming just another airline run by bean-counters instead of its people. It started when the government privatised ‘just a small percentage’ of the airline – ‘nothing to worry about’, which was then followed by another ‘small’ sell-off. It used to be ‘our’ airline - now it is majority owned by foreigners. As one local recently wrote ‘would someone please remove the Kangaroo off the tail of the aircraft and stop calling it ‘Australia’s’ national carrier’.
Since then, part of the servicing has been off-shored to countries with cheaper labour costs (but not necessarily similar safety standards) and those domestic engineers with years or decades of experience not laid off had some of their work replaced by local sub-contracted firms who now compete at the lowest price.
The engineers used to be able to go home at the end of every day confidant that each aircraft was fully safe to fly. Now they are having their hours cut, their workloads increased, they are not getting the right tools and management is making them responsible for the work of service technicians in the second and third world. They are not given the time to fully inspect others work yet are being politically cornered into signing the plane as airworthy. Now that is not to say they are knowingly putting un-airworthy planes in the air – but these dedicated mechanics know that there’s a difference between crossing a line at 55% and getting well past it at 85% or more.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23026208-2,00.html
The engineers at Qantas have known for a long time that management is indulging in their salami-slicing tactics - taking a millimetre off here and a millimetre off there. But now even the non-technical flight-attendants can smell something’ fishy and wanting more than being fobbed off with the usual glib assurances from those in charge. After all, they are the ones being asked to go up each and every day.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080803/wl_asia_afp/australiaairlineqantasunion
I have a sinking feeling that it is just a matter of time now before a serious accident happens. Maybe at that point the management will decide that they have finally shaved off enough…
Good Lord, is this still going on? Does it ever end?
The highly superficial yet wall to wall coverage of every unimportant move, gesture, cough and wardrobe choices continues. Ad nausea…
Thousands of trees were sacrificed one month so that every newspaper from coast to coast could dissect and trisect the word ‘bitter’ sixteen ways from Sunday…
An informed critique of foreign and economic policy was foregone in lieu of an extended navel gazing exercise as to ‘why doesn’t Obama wear a flag lapel pin’. Erm, I didn’t know it was mandatory to wear one? And is the not so hidden insinuation supposed to be that people who don’t wear one are somehow not as ‘patriotic’ as those who do?
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/19/roland.martin.05.19/index.html
Hillary promises to drop atomic bombs on
We all know that regardless of whom gets in nothing will change...Neither Republicans nor Democrats are going to leave
National Health care will be strangled at birth by the giant medical industry leaving the
Billions of taxpayers’ dollars will continue to be spent on boondoggle science fiction weapons programs/missile shields that don’t work instead of roads, bridges, schools etc., even though the U.S has a defence budget and more tanks, ships, bombs and planes than the rest of the world combined. And the White House will chastise other nations for ‘worrying’ arms build-ups yet meanwhile continue to weaponise space themselves much to everyone else's concern. It 's a bit like the Elephant saying he's 'really worried' about a little mouse...
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
http://www.acronym.org.uk/space/congo.htm
The President will continue to bemoan rising petrol prices and oil dependency but do nothing to curb
Dear God just let it finish soon…
Anyway, I changed systems from Pentax to Canon when I was in Iraq as the lens and flash back-up was just light years ahead with the latter brand, and remember the day that I got my Canon EOS 1V 35mm film camera delivered to Taji APO (digital was only just starting to be taken seriously on the SLR scene).
http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/SLR/EOS_1V/index.asp
http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_SLR/EOS_5D/index.asp